back to updates & publications

(CORPORATE TAX): ECJ DECISION: BEVOLA, JENS W. TROCK APS (CASE C-650/16)

This case sought a ruling from the ECJ on the interpretation of Article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

Summary of the facts

The Danish authorities refused to allow the Appellant, Bevola to deduct from its taxable income the losses incurred by its Finnish establishment, Jens.

Bevola had its permanent establishment in Denmark and it traded in the manufacture of wagons and trailers for the wholesale sector. It was a subsidiary and sub-subsidiary of Danish companies that are themselves controlled by Jens W. Trock, the group’s parent company, which also has its seat in Denmark.

Bevolaʼs establishment in Finland ceased trading in 2009 and losses incurred of circa 375,000 Euros could not be deducted in Finland following the closure. Bevola submitted an application to deduct those losses from its taxable income in Denmark for the year 2009.

The Danish tax authorities denied the application on the grounds that the law on corporation tax did not allow the inclusion in taxable income of income and expenditure relating to a permanent establishment or real property situated in a Foreign State, unless the company had opted for the international joint taxation scheme. Bevola claimed that it would have been possible to deduct the losses in question if they had been incurred by a Danish establishment.

Questions referred to the ECJ

Does Article 49 TFEU preclude a national taxation scheme such as that at issue in the main proceedings under which it is possible to make deductions for losses in domestic branches, while it is not possible to make deductions for losses in branches situated in other Member States, including in circumstances corresponding to those in the Court’s judgment [of 13 December 2005] in Marks & Spencer, C‑446/03, EU:C:2005:763, paragraphs 55 and 56, unless the group has opted for international joint taxation on the terms as set out in the main proceedings?’

Conclusions by the ECJ

Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which it is not possible for a resident company which has not opted for an international joint taxation scheme, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, to deduct from its taxable profits losses incurred by a permanent establishment in another Member State, where, first, that company has exhausted the possibilities of deducting those losses available under the law of the Member State in which the establishment is situated and, second, it has ceased to receive any income from that establishment, so that there is no longer any possibility of the losses being taken into account in that Member State, which is for the national court to ascertain.

For more information kindly contact:

Franco Falzon
(Managing Partner)
E: franco@ffinternational.com.mt


Disclaimer

While FF International Limited (hereinafter referred to as “FFI”) endeavours to ensure that any information published in articles / publications / memos / updates (including any information published on our website) is accurate as at the time of publication, FFI nor any of their respective directors, partners, officers, employees, or agents make any representation or warranty (express or implied) or accept or will accept any responsibility or liability in relation to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained published in our articles / publications / memos / updates (including any information published on our website) or any other written or oral information made available or published on our articles / publications / memos and updates. Any responsibility or liability in respect of any such information or any inaccuracy or omission arising from any article / publication / memo is expressly disclaimed. In particular, but without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, no representation or warranty is given as to the achievement or reasonableness of any future projections, estimates, prospects or returns published on our articles / publications / memos / updates (including any information published on our website) . The content of the above article / publication / memo / update and any information published on our website is intended to serve solely as general information only and its purpose is not to provide any specific professional advice whether of a financial, legal, tax or other nature. Since it is recommended that business decisions be based only on qualified professional advice, neither FFI nor any related company belonging to FFI nor any of the respective directors, partners, officers, employees, or agents of FFI will be held liable for any damages which might result as a consequence of relying on the information contained within. FFI including any directors, partners, officers, employees, or agents of FFI and / or any entity related to FFI accept no liability whatsoever for the content of this article / publication / memo / update for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the information provided. If you have any questions relating to the accuracy and correctness of the above article / publication / memo / updates or any information published on our website you are kindly requested inform us by sending us an email on info@ffinternational.com.mt